BMW F 900 GS vs QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S Compare Specifications
| Feature | BMW F 900 GS | QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S |
|---|---|---|
| Engine size | 900cc | 800cc |
| Power | 105hp | 92hp |
| Torque | 93nm. | 77nm. |
| Cylinder / Valve | Single Cylinder, 8 with valve | Double Cylinder, 8 with valve |
| Weight | 219kg | 257kg |
| Front Brake | Dual disc brakes, floating brake discs, 305 mm diameter, dual-piston floating caliper. | Disc ø320mm(double)(ABS) |
| Rear Brake | Single disc brake, 265 mm diameter, single-piston floating caliper. | Disc ø260mm(ABS) |
| Saddle Height (cm) | 87cm | 81cm |
| Front Tyre | 90/90 R21 | 120/70ZR17 |
| Rear Tyre | 150/70 R17 | 180/55ZR17 |
| Cooling | Liquid Cooling | Liquid Cooling |
| Front Suspansion | Upside-down fork, 43 mm diameter, manually adjustable spring preload, adjustable rebound and compression damping. | Telescopic Upside-Down |
| Rear Suspansion | Aluminum, double-sided swingarm, directly hinged WAD central spring linkage, hydraulic spring base adjustable, adjustable rebound progressive shock absorber. | Telescopic coil spring oil damped |
| Motorcycle Type | Adventure | Touring |
| Top Speed | 210km/h | 230km/h |
| Fuel Capacity / Consumption | 14.5 lt - 4.8lt/100km | 24 lt - 6lt/100km |
| Prevalence of Service Network | ||
| Service Quality | ||
| Spare Parts Availability | ||
| Price | 14195$ | 0$ |
| For Other Motorcycle Price Lists | Click for BMW Price List | Click for QJMOTOR Price List |
2024 BMW F 900 GS vs 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S: Which One is Better for You?
2024 BMW F 900 GS and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S are very similar in terms of engine capacity and power. In this case, design, driving comfort, and personal preferences may take precedence. Additionally, 2024 BMW F 900 GS, with its 105hp, stands out for users seeking speed and performance.
1. Cylinder Capacity and Performance
2024 BMW F 900 GS and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S have almost identical engine capacities, offering similar performance. In this case, design, driving comfort, and other features will play a more significant role in your choice.2024 BMW F 900 GS, with its 900cc engine capacity, is ideal for users seeking high performance and acceleration. Designed for performance-focused users and professionals.
2. Torque Power
2024 BMW F 900 GS, with its 93Nm torque, delivers powerful performance. A high torque value ensures superior acceleration and advantage on steep inclines. 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S, with its 77Nm torque, offers a more balanced ride for city use. 2024 BMW F 900 GS is ideal for users requiring rapid acceleration. Moderate torque power is suitable for both city use and short-distance trips.
3. Top Speed
2024 BMW F 900 GS (Adventure) and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S (Touring) have very similar maximum speed values. 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S offers a slight advantage with a top speed of 230 km/h. However, this difference might not be noticeable for most users.
4. Cooling System
2024 BMW F 900 GS features a Liquid-Cooled system, while 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S offers a Liquid-Cooled system. Both models deliver equal performance in their cooling systems.
5. Design and Comfort
2024 BMW F 900 GS and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S are close in weight, offering similar experiences for different usage scenarios. Additionally, 2024 BMW F 900 GS, with a seat height of 87cm, is more suitable for taller riders, offering greater comfort.2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S, with a seat height of 81cm, provides a more ergonomic ride for average-height riders.
Conclusion
2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S emerges as the winner of this comparison based on total points. 2024 BMW F 900 GS and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S have nearly identical engine capacities. 2024 BMW F 900 GS, with higher torque, excels in rapid acceleration and steep climbs. 2024 BMW F 900 GS and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S offer very similar top speed values. Both models have similar cooling systems, offering comparable performance for long journeys. In conclusion, 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S stands out in terms of technical specifications and overall performance. However, depending on your riding preferences and usage needs, both models offer unique advantages.
