TVS Apache RTR 200 4V vs QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S Compare Specifications
| Feature | TVS Apache RTR 200 4V | QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S |
|---|---|---|
| Engine size | 200cc | 250cc |
| Power | 20.8hp | 27.5hp |
| Torque | 17.2nm. | 22.5nm. |
| Cylinder / Valve | Single Cylinder, 4 with valve | Single Cylinder, 4 with valve |
| Weight | 152kg | 151kg |
| Front Brake | Disc 270 mm (Petal Type) | Disc ø300mm |
| Rear Brake | Disc 240 mm (Petal Type) | Disc ø240mm |
| Saddle Height (cm) | 80cm | 78cm |
| Front Tyre | 90/90-17 49P Tubeless | 110-70-R17 |
| Rear Tyre | 130/70 R17 M/C 62P Tubeless (Radial) | 140/60-R17 |
| Cooling | Oil Cooled | Liquid Cooling |
| Front Suspansion | Telescopic Forks with Preload Adjuster | Telescopic Upside-Down |
| Rear Suspansion | Mono Tube - Mono Shock | Telescopic coil spring oil damped |
| Motorcycle Type | Naked | Naked |
| Top Speed | 130km/h | 158km/h |
| Fuel Capacity / Consumption | 12 lt - 3.2lt/100km | 12.5 lt - 3.7lt/100km |
| Prevalence of Service Network | ||
| Service Quality | ||
| Spare Parts Availability | ||
| Price | 147820$ | 0$ |
| For Other Motorcycle Price Lists | Click for TVS Price List | Click for QJMOTOR Price List |
2024 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V vs 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S: Which One is Better for You?
2024 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S are very similar in terms of engine capacity and power. In this case, design, driving comfort, and personal preferences may take precedence. Additionally, 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S, with its 27.5hp, stands out for users seeking speed and performance.
1. Cylinder Capacity and Performance
2024 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S have almost identical engine capacities, offering similar performance. In this case, design, driving comfort, and other features will play a more significant role in your choice.2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S, with its 250cc engine capacity, is ideal for users seeking high performance and acceleration. It is ideal for intermediate users in urban areas and short distances.
2. Torque Power
2024 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S offer similar performance in terms of torque values. 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S, with its 22.5Nm, provides slightly better traction power, which can be advantageous in situations requiring rapid acceleration. 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S is ideal for users requiring rapid acceleration. This torque value provides economical and sufficient power for city use.
3. Top Speed
2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S, as a Naked, can reach a maximum speed of 158 km/h. This speed feature can be considered an extra advantage for a motorcycle of this type. 2024 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V, as a Naked, offers a lower maximum speed of 130 km/h, but this does not overshadow its other features.
4. Cooling System
2024 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V features a Oil-Cooled system, while 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S offers a Liquid-Cooled system. 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S is a more ideal choice for long journeys.
5. Design and Comfort
2024 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S are close in weight, offering similar experiences for different usage scenarios. Additionally, 2024 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V, with a seat height of 80cm, is more suitable for taller riders, offering greater comfort.2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S, with a seat height of 78cm, provides a more ergonomic ride for average-height riders.
Conclusion
2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S emerges as the winner of this comparison based on total points. 2024 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S have nearly identical engine capacities. 2024 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S offer very similar performance in terms of torque. 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S, with a top speed of 158 km/h, stands out for speed enthusiasts. 2024 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V features a oil-cooled system, while 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S features a liquid-cooled system. 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S performs better in long journeys and hot weather conditions. In conclusion, 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S stands out in terms of technical specifications and overall performance. However, depending on your riding preferences and usage needs, both models offer unique advantages.
