SUZUKI GSX-R1000R vs YAMAHA YZF-R3 Compare Specifications
| Feature | SUZUKI GSX-R1000R | YAMAHA YZF-R3 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine size | 1000cc | 300cc |
| Power | 202hp | 41.4hp |
| Torque | 103.4nm. | 29.6nm. |
| Cylinder / Valve | 4 Cylinders, 16 with valve | Double Cylinder, 8 with valve |
| Weight | 202kg | 169kg |
| Front Brake | Brembo Monobloc, 4-piston, twin disc, ABS-equipped | 298mm disc w/ ABS |
| Rear Brake | Nissin, 1-piston, single disc, ABS-equipped | 220mm disc w/ ABS |
| Saddle Height (cm) | 82.5cm | 78cm |
| Front Tyre | 120/70ZR17M/C (58W), tubeless | Dunlop Sportmax GPR-300; 110/70-17 / 140/70-17 |
| Rear Tyre | 190/55ZR17M/C (75W), tubeless | Dunlop Sportmax GPR-300; 140/70-17 |
| Cooling | Liquid Cooling | Liquid Cooling |
| Front Suspansion | Showa Inverted telescopic, coil spring, oil damped | USD fork, 5.1 in. travel |
| Rear Suspansion | Link type, single shock, coil spring, oil damped | Monocross single shock, preload adjustable; 4.9 in. travel |
| Motorcycle Type | Supersport | Supersport |
| Top Speed | 330km/h | 190km/h |
| Fuel Capacity / Consumption | 16 lt - 7lt/100km | 14 lt - 3.8lt/100km |
| Prevalence of Service Network | ||
| Service Quality | ||
| Spare Parts Availability | ||
| Price | 18499$ | 5499$ |
| For Other Motorcycle Price Lists | Click for SUZUKI Price List | Click for YAMAHA Price List |
2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R vs 2024 YAMAHA YZF-R3: Which One is Better for You?
2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R, with its 1000cc engine capacity, is a much more powerful and performance-oriented option than the 2024 YAMAHA YZF-R3 model. Additionally, 2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R, with its 202hp, stands out for users seeking speed and performance.
1. Cylinder Capacity and Performance
2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R, with its 1000cc engine capacity, offers a performance-oriented experience. On the other hand, the smaller 2024 YAMAHA YZF-R3 with its 300cc is a more practical and economical choice for city use.2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R, with its 1000cc engine capacity, is ideal for users seeking high performance and acceleration. Designed for performance-focused users and professionals.
2. Torque Power
2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R, with its 103.4Nm torque, delivers powerful performance. A high torque value ensures superior acceleration and advantage on steep inclines. 2024 YAMAHA YZF-R3, with its 29.6Nm torque, offers a more balanced ride for city use. 2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R is ideal for users requiring rapid acceleration. High torque power offers significant advantages in heavy load carrying, off-road driving, or situations requiring high speed.
3. Top Speed
2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R, as a Süpersport, can reach a maximum speed of 330 km/h. This speed feature can be considered an extra advantage for a motorcycle of this type. 2024 YAMAHA YZF-R3, as a Süpersport, offers a lower maximum speed of 190 km/h, but this does not overshadow its other features.
4. Cooling System
2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R features a Liquid-Cooled system, while 2024 YAMAHA YZF-R3 offers a Liquid-Cooled system. Both models deliver equal performance in their cooling systems.
5. Design and Comfort
2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R and 2024 YAMAHA YZF-R3 are close in weight, offering similar experiences for different usage scenarios. Additionally, 2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R, with a seat height of 82.5cm, is more suitable for taller riders, offering greater comfort.2024 YAMAHA YZF-R3, with a seat height of 78cm, provides a more ergonomic ride for average-height riders.
Conclusion
2024 YAMAHA YZF-R3 emerges as the winner of this comparison based on total points. 2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R, with its 1000cc engine capacity, delivers much stronger performance than 2024 YAMAHA YZF-R3. 2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R, with higher torque, excels in rapid acceleration and steep climbs. 2024 SUZUKI GSX-R1000R, with a top speed of 330 km/h, stands out for speed enthusiasts. Both models have similar cooling systems, offering comparable performance for long journeys. In conclusion, 2024 YAMAHA YZF-R3 stands out in terms of technical specifications and overall performance. However, depending on your riding preferences and usage needs, both models offer unique advantages.
