KAWASAKI Z900RS SE vs QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S Compare Specifications
| Feature | KAWASAKI Z900RS SE | QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S |
|---|---|---|
| Engine size | 900cc | 800cc |
| Power | 111hp | 92hp |
| Torque | 98.5nm. | 77nm. |
| Cylinder / Valve | 4 Cylinders, 16 with valve | Double Cylinder, 8 with valve |
| Weight | 215kg | 257kg |
| Front Brake | Twin semi-floating 300 mm discs. Caliper: Twin Brembo M4 radial mounted, monoblock, opposed 4-piston | Disc ø320mm(double)(ABS) |
| Rear Brake | 250 mm single disc. Caliper: Single-piston | Disc ø260mm(ABS) |
| Saddle Height (cm) | 84.5cm | 81cm |
| Front Tyre | 120/70ZR17M/C (58W) | 120/70ZR17 |
| Rear Tyre | 180/55ZR17M/C (73W) | 180/55ZR17 |
| Cooling | Liquid Cooling | Liquid Cooling |
| Front Suspansion | 41 mm inverted fork, compression and rebound damping, and adjustable spring preload | Telescopic Upside-Down |
| Rear Suspansion | Horizontal Back-link, rebound damping, and adjustable spring preload gas-charged shock | Telescopic coil spring oil damped |
| Motorcycle Type | Naked | Touring |
| Top Speed | 240km/h | 230km/h |
| Fuel Capacity / Consumption | 17 lt - 7lt/100km | 24 lt - 6lt/100km |
| Prevalence of Service Network | ||
| Service Quality | ||
| Spare Parts Availability | ||
| Price | 12349$ | 0$ |
| For Other Motorcycle Price Lists | Click for KAWASAKI Price List | Click for QJMOTOR Price List |
2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE vs 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S: Which One is Better for You?
2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S are very similar in terms of engine capacity and power. In this case, design, driving comfort, and personal preferences may take precedence. Additionally, 2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE, with its 111hp, stands out for users seeking speed and performance.
1. Cylinder Capacity and Performance
2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S have almost identical engine capacities, offering similar performance. In this case, design, driving comfort, and other features will play a more significant role in your choice.2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE, with its 900cc engine capacity, is ideal for users seeking high performance and acceleration. Designed for performance-focused users and professionals.
2. Torque Power
2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE, with its 98.5Nm torque, delivers powerful performance. A high torque value ensures superior acceleration and advantage on steep inclines. 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S, with its 77Nm torque, offers a more balanced ride for city use. 2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE is ideal for users requiring rapid acceleration. Moderate torque power is suitable for both city use and short-distance trips.
3. Top Speed
2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE (Naked) and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S (Touring) have very similar maximum speed values. 2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE offers a slight advantage with a top speed of 240 km/h. However, this difference might not be noticeable for most users.
4. Cooling System
2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE features a Liquid-Cooled system, while 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S offers a Liquid-Cooled system. Both models deliver equal performance in their cooling systems.
5. Design and Comfort
2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S are close in weight, offering similar experiences for different usage scenarios. Additionally, 2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE, with a seat height of 84.5cm, is more suitable for taller riders, offering greater comfort.2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S, with a seat height of 81cm, provides a more ergonomic ride for average-height riders.
Conclusion
2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S emerges as the winner of this comparison based on total points. 2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S have nearly identical engine capacities. 2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE, with higher torque, excels in rapid acceleration and steep climbs. 2023 KAWASAKI Z900RS SE and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S offer very similar top speed values. Both models have similar cooling systems, offering comparable performance for long journeys. In conclusion, 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 S stands out in terms of technical specifications and overall performance. However, depending on your riding preferences and usage needs, both models offer unique advantages.
